Rebecca Sramkova vs Jasmine Paolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Mar at 06:28 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Sramkova vs J. Paolini

SVK
4
Win
Played
4
Win

ITA
4
Win
Played
4
Win
Head-to-head: Sramkova 4 - 4 Paolini
They have played 18 sets in total, with Rebecca Sramkova winning 8 and Jasmine Paolini winning 10. The last match between Jasmine Paolini and Rebecca Sramkova was at the Miami Open - Miami, 20-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sramkova | 4 |
| Paolini | 4 |
Last 8 H2H Matches:
(R2) Miami Open - Miami(03-20-25)
(Rubber 2) Billie Jean King Cup, Finals(11-20-24)
(SF) Makarska Open 125 - Makarska(06-10-23)
R. Sramkova vs J. Paolini H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,236,989 | Career Prize Money | $8,519,140 |
| 60.55% (439-286) | Career Total W/L | 59.76% (444-299) |
| 3 | Clay | 2 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 14 | Titles | 14 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 44.90% (22-27) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.66% (46-21) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
R. Sramkova vs J. Paolini Match Preview:
When evaluating the performance of Jasmine Paolini and Rebecca Sramkova, several key statistics emerge that can influence the prediction of their upcoming tennis match. Focusing on second serve performance over the past six months, Paolini has a slight edge, securing 42.95% of her points compared to Sramkova’s 41.35%. Such figures serve as significant indicators of likely match outcomes.
Analyzing their return game statistics, Paolini shows an advantage in winning 49.83% of her opponent's second serve points, while Sramkova trails with 46.82%. However, in first serve returns, Sramkova leads slightly, achieving a return rate of 32.06%, compared to Paolini’s 29.64%. These mixed results demonstrate the intricacy of predicting the match favorite, particularly in head-to-head scenarios.
Both athletes show resilience under pressure, with Sramkova saving 48.58% of breakpoints and Paolini closely behind at 47.47%. These metrics are pivotal for in-game betting strategies. When evaluating overall performance from the past year, Paolini has won 66.1% of her matches, while Sramkova has a win rate of 61.76%. This provides a broad overview of player form entering the matchup.
Exploring surface records reveals that both players favor clay courts, with Sramkova winning 65% and Paolini 63% of their matches on this surface throughout their careers. However, Paolini's weakest surface is grass with a 48% win rate, whereas Sramkova’s is on hard courts, tallying a 55% win rate. This distinction highlights potential surface influence on match results.
In terms of competition level, Paolini has predominantly participated in Masters series events with a 52.17% win rate, compared to Sramkova's more main tour-focused schedule, achieving a 66.67% win rate. Such differences underscore the impact of event level on their performance records.
Head-to-head confrontations between these players show Sramkova slightly leading with four victories to Paolini's three. However, their sets are evenly split at 8-8, and Paolini won their last encounter at the Billie Jean King Cup in commanding fashion, securing a 6-2, 6-1 victory. Yet, in deciding sets, Sramkova has the upper hand, winning both encounters against Paolini, making her a sturdy contender if the match extends to a deciding set.
Against tough opponents, Paolini has faced more challenging competition, with her adversaries averaging a rank of 55.53, significantly higher than Sramkova's average opponent rank of 105.22. Observing break point conversion rates, Sramkova narrowly outperforms Paolini, converting 36.32% of opportunities compared to 35.82% for Paolini, a formidable attribute for in-game strategies under breakpoint scenarios.
With the combination of these statistics, the predictive elements slightly favor Rebecca Sramkova for a potential victory in this closely matched encounter. Nevertheless, each player's unique strengths might significantly impact the outcome, offering a thrilling contest on the court.
Rebecca Sramkova vs Jasmine Paolini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Sramkova vs J. Paolini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 10 |
| 79 | Games Won | 87 |
| 38 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 25 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1:29:44 | Average Match Time | 1:29:44 |
| 58% (333/571) | 1st Serve % | 61% (324/532) |
| 60% (200/333) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (198/324) |
| 47% (112/238) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (92/208) |
| 43% (29/68) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (34/81) |
| 45% (242/532) | Return Points Win % | 45% (259/571) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (1/5) |
| 20% (1/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Sramkova Recent Matches Played
J. Paolini Recent Matches Played

R. Sramkova vs J. Paolini Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.55% (439/286) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.76% (444/299) |
| 58.26% (980/702) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.29% (980/761) |
| 53.15% (8352/7362) | Games Win/Loss | 52.33% (8348/7606) |
| 54.09% (86/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.56% (154/109) |
| 64.17% (240/134) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.02% (226/127) |
| 59.51% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.09% (47/45) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1681 | Aces Total | 565 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1524 | Total Double Faults | 1331 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:15:35 |
| 434.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.48 |
| 58% (21468/36983) | 1st Serve % | 65% (27287/41869) |
| 64% (13837/21468) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (16300/27287) |
| 47% (7228/15515) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6854/14578) |
| 45% (2055/4528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2470/5133) |
| 45% (16367/36695) | Return Points Win % | 46% (18631/40731) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Slam W/L | 51.39% (37/35) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Masters W/L | 57.01% (61/46) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 57.89% (11/8) |
| 50.55% (46/45) | Main Tour W/L | 55.15% (107/87) |
| 61.81% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 64.36% (177/98) |
| 73.64% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 67.11% (51/25) |
| 60% (431/715) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (433/732) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 56% (96/170) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (82/150) |
| 55% (129/234) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (159/262) |
| 86% (434/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (400/344) |
| 14% (434/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (400/55) |
| 22% (291/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (342/95) |